This will be an unpopular opinion but after a lot of thought, I am now in favor of a retread experienced coach looking for his last job before retirement a la Fran. I DONT want that to be our long term strategy, but I think it’s necessary until we have a functional athletic department.
There are so many obstacles to overcome within our athletic department, I don’t think it’s realistic to ask somebody with only coordinator experience to learn to be a HC while simultaneously working around the mess. I actually think Spav is a decent coach but he’s in over his head right now.
When we go FCS, it’s likely going to be a guy coming from a much more functional program, even if it has a smaller budget.
The most success we had at this level was easily with Fran. He wasn’t a particularly great coach but had been around enough athletic departments to figure out a way to make it work. We need to get back to that basic functional level then we can go get the next hot shot coordinator.
I don't hate the idea because in our history it's clearly the only way we've found success at this level.
However, I have two main issues...
1) What is the retread coach motivated by? If they were moderately successful throughout a long career, they should have hefty retirement savings - they don't *need* the paycheck, and they're probably not looking to step up from here.
I understand that those things aren't crucial to success and motivation to win, but it brings me to my other concern...
2) How do you end on a positive note? The best case scenario at the G5 level is that a coach is successful and hired away because that means we're in a good spot for someone to come in and build on that momentum. What retread coach is going to take a team to a pair of 10 win seasons and ride off into the sunset? Either they're unsuccessful and forced into retirement, or they experience unsustained success and eventually get ran out anyways a la Fran. I'm sure there are examples of this scenario going well, but I'd imagine they're far and few between.