Before I start I think he merits firing. Especially with the state of the defense.
Anyway.
Here are some reasons why he shouldn't be fired. Feel free to come up with some of your own.
it's ok to be bad, but not to be toxic.
There are lots of bad football teams. Bad football teams turn into good football teams all the time. It goes the other way as well. Fans, coaches, and players understand that sustained success is difficult. That's why coaches do get fired , things get worked out, and shit gets cycled.
Being a 3-4 win team isn't that bad for your brand. Arkansas has been struggling for years, Iowa st previous had been middle of the pack at best. I can pick better examples if you like but you probably know a team that was on a 4-5 year losing streak then put together a killer season.
What doesn't work is becoming known as the school that doesn't support the coaches and players. Unfortunately our brand is so bad that no one cares if we lose. No one is suprised and no one is downgrading their opinions of us. What will do that is if we fire our 3rd coach in 9 years, and our 2md coach halfway through a season. We absolutely cannot become the school good coaches avoid. We are arguably the worst job in FBS already. As painful as it is watch spav and co finish out a 2 win season isn't the worst thing that can happen to bobcat football. Y'all don't want to believe it but the team IS better than in the last six years. Our opponent were also just better last year and this year. Worse teams than EMU have blown us out before, we've lost on the road to worse teams than FIU. (Our first FBS road win in 5 years).
Everyone needs to take a chill pill and sit tight for the new president and what happens with the AD. I think the right move is to use the fan angry to force Zac Spav out. He is clearly out of his league. We need a real DC. Peeler is great, spavs play calling ... Will be better once we have a QB that opens up the playbook.
What we really need is to hang tight ... Try and repair relationships with highschool coaches ... Maybe use the anger to make sure problems with athletic trainers and nutrition are properly addressed instead of just swapping coaches.
Firing Withers to hire spav instead of fixing our problems with adequate funding and a proper AD is a lot like benching Brady to save the season.
Sure it might help 1-2 things but it isn't the reason we are losing. I fear the same is true for Jake spav. Gotta make him fire his brother, gotta fix issues with athletic trainers (how do we have so many injuries?), Gotta feed our boys properly.
I'm not saying to settle for mediocrity. I'm saying choices have been made already that we can't undo. Making a swap at coaching, either at the end of this year or mid season could do long term damage without much upside. Letting spav lose for a year or more doesn't hurt our brand because frankly it's too low to damage.
Anyway.
Here are some reasons why he shouldn't be fired. Feel free to come up with some of your own.
it's ok to be bad, but not to be toxic.
There are lots of bad football teams. Bad football teams turn into good football teams all the time. It goes the other way as well. Fans, coaches, and players understand that sustained success is difficult. That's why coaches do get fired , things get worked out, and shit gets cycled.
Being a 3-4 win team isn't that bad for your brand. Arkansas has been struggling for years, Iowa st previous had been middle of the pack at best. I can pick better examples if you like but you probably know a team that was on a 4-5 year losing streak then put together a killer season.
What doesn't work is becoming known as the school that doesn't support the coaches and players. Unfortunately our brand is so bad that no one cares if we lose. No one is suprised and no one is downgrading their opinions of us. What will do that is if we fire our 3rd coach in 9 years, and our 2md coach halfway through a season. We absolutely cannot become the school good coaches avoid. We are arguably the worst job in FBS already. As painful as it is watch spav and co finish out a 2 win season isn't the worst thing that can happen to bobcat football. Y'all don't want to believe it but the team IS better than in the last six years. Our opponent were also just better last year and this year. Worse teams than EMU have blown us out before, we've lost on the road to worse teams than FIU. (Our first FBS road win in 5 years).
Everyone needs to take a chill pill and sit tight for the new president and what happens with the AD. I think the right move is to use the fan angry to force Zac Spav out. He is clearly out of his league. We need a real DC. Peeler is great, spavs play calling ... Will be better once we have a QB that opens up the playbook.
What we really need is to hang tight ... Try and repair relationships with highschool coaches ... Maybe use the anger to make sure problems with athletic trainers and nutrition are properly addressed instead of just swapping coaches.
Firing Withers to hire spav instead of fixing our problems with adequate funding and a proper AD is a lot like benching Brady to save the season.
Sure it might help 1-2 things but it isn't the reason we are losing. I fear the same is true for Jake spav. Gotta make him fire his brother, gotta fix issues with athletic trainers (how do we have so many injuries?), Gotta feed our boys properly.
I'm not saying to settle for mediocrity. I'm saying choices have been made already that we can't undo. Making a swap at coaching, either at the end of this year or mid season could do long term damage without much upside. Letting spav lose for a year or more doesn't hurt our brand because frankly it's too low to damage.